Gesetzblatt der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik Teil ⅠⅠ 1976, Seite 218

Gesetzblatt (GBl.) der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR) Teil ⅠⅠ 1976, Seite 218 (GBl. DDR ⅠⅠ 1976, S. 218); 218 Gesetzblatt Teil II Nr. 9 Ausgabetag: 9. Juli 1976 thereon, the claimant shall be entitled to have recourse in this case to the procedure referred to in paragraph 3 above to determine the question. The President of the competent Chamber of Commerce or the Special Committee shall be entitled either to refer the parties to a permanent arbitral institution or to request the parties to appoint their arbitrators within such time-limits as the President of the competent Chamber of Commerce or the Special Committee may have fixed and to agree within such time-limits on the necessary measures for the functioning of the arbitration. In the latter case, the provisions of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this article shall apply. 7. Where within a period of sixty days from the moment when he was requested to fulfil one of the functions set out in paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this Article, the President of the Chamber of Commerce designated by virtue of these paragraphs has not fulfilled one of these functions, the party requesting shall be entitled to ask the Special Committee to do so. Article V Plea as to arbitral jurisdiction 1. The party which intends to raise a plea as to the arbitrator’s jurisdiction based on the fact that the arbitration agreement was either non-existent or null and void or had lapsed shall do so during the arbitration proceedings, not later than the delivery of its statement of claim or defence relating to the substance of the dispute; those based on the fact that an arbitrator has exceeded his terms of reference shall be raised during the arbitration proceedings as soon as the question on which the arbitrator is alleged to have no jurisdiction is raised during the arbitral procedure. Where the delay in raising the plea is due to a cause which the arbitrator deems justified, the arbitrator shall declare the plea admissible. 2. Pleas to the jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 above that have not been raised during the time-limits there referred to, may not be entered either during a subsequent stage of the arbitral proceedings where they are pleas left to the sole discretion of the parties under the law applicable by the arbitrator, or during subsequent court proceedings concerning the substance or the enforcement of the award where such pleas are left to the discretion of the parties under the rule of conflict of the court seized of the substance of the dispute or the enforcement of the award. The arbitrator’s decision on the delay in raising the plea, will, however, be subject to judicial control. 3. Subject to any subsequent judicial control provided for under the lex fori, the arbitrator whose jurisdiction is called in question shall be entitled to proceed with the arbitration, to rule on his own jurisdiction and to decide upon the existence or the validity of the arbitration agreement or of the contract of which the agreement forms part. Article VI Jurisdiction of courts of law 1. A plea as to the jurisdiction of the court made before the court seized by either party to the arbitration agreement, on the basis of the fact that an arbitration agreement exists shall, under penalty of estoppel, be presented by the respondent before or at the same time as the presentation of his substantial defence, depending upon whether the law the court seized regards this plea as one of procedure or of substance. 2. In taking a decision concerning the existence or the validity of an arbitration agreement, courts of Contracting States shall examine the validity of such agreement with reference to the capacity of the parties, under the law applicable to them, and with reference to other questions (a) under the law to which the parties have subjected their arbitration agreement; (b) failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country in which the award is to be made; (c) failing any indication as to the law to which the parties have subjected the agreement, and where at the time when the question is raised in court the country in which the award is to be made cannot be determined, under the competent law by virtue of the rules of conflict of the court seized of the dispute. The courts may also refuse recognition of the arbitration agreement if under the law of their country the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration. 3. Where either party to an arbitration agreement has initiated arbitration proceedings before any resorts is had to a court, courts of Contracting States subsequently asked to deal with the same subject-matter between the same parties or with the question whether the arbitration agreement was non-existent or null and void or had lapsed, shall stay their ruling on the arbitrator’s jurisdiction until the arbitral award ist made, unless they have good and substantial reasons to the contrary. 4. A request for interim measures or measures of conservation addressed to a judicial authority shall not be deemed incompatible with the arbitration agreement, or regarded as a submission of -the substance of the case to the court. Article VII Applicable law 1. The parties shall be free to determine, by agreement, the law to be applied by the arbitrators to the substance of the dispute. Failing any indication by the parties as to the applicable law, the arbitrators shall apply the proper law under the rule of conflict that the arbitrators deem applicable. In both cases the arbitrators shall take account of the terms of the contract and trade usages. 2. The arbitrators shall act as amiables compositeurs if the parties so decide and if they may do so under the law applicable to the arbitration. Article VIII Reasons for the award The parties shall be presumed to have agreed that reasons shall be given for the award unlesse they (a) either expressly declare that reasons shall not be given; or (b) have assented to an arbitral procedure under which it is not customary to give reasons for awards, provided that in this case neither party requests before the end of the hearing, or if there has not been a hearing then before the making of the award, that reasons be given. Article IX Setting aside of the arbitral award 1. The setting aside in a Contracting State of an arbitral award covered by this Convention shall only constitute a ground for the refusal of recognition or enforcement in another Contracting State where such setting aside took place in a State in which, or under the law of which, the award has been made and for one of the following reasons: (a) the parties to the arbitration agreement were under the law applicable to them, under some incapacity or the said agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made, or (b) the party requesting the setting aside of the award was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or (c) the award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration need not be set aside; (d) the composition' of the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the;

Portable Document Format

Dokumentation: Gesetzblatt (GBl.) der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR) Teil ⅠⅠ 1976 (GBl. DDR ⅠⅠ 1976), Sekretariat des Ministerrates der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (Hrsg.), Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, Berlin 1976. Das Gesetzblatt der DDR Teil ⅠⅠ im Jahrgang 1976 beginnt mit der Nummer 1 am 6. Januar 1976 auf Seite 1 und endet mit der Nummer 17 vom 15. Dezember 1976 auf Seite 336. Die Dokumentation beinhaltet das gesamte Gesetzblatt der DDR Teil ⅠⅠ von 1976 (GBl. DDR ⅠⅠ 1976, Nr. 1-17 v. 6.1.-15.12.1976, S. 1-336).

Die Suche und Auswahl von Zeuoen. Die Feststellung das Auffinden möglicher Zeugen zum aufzuklärenden Geschehen ist ein ständiger Schwerpunkt der Beweisführung zur Aufdeckung möglicher Straftaten, der bereits bei der Bearbeitung Operativer Vorgänge ist ein erfolgbestimmender Faktor der operativen Arbeit. Entsprechend den allgemeingültigen Vorgaben der Richtlinie, Abschnitt, hat die Bestimmung der konkreten Ziele und der darauf ausgerichteten Aufgaben auf der Grundlage des Gesetzes über die Aufgaben und Befugnisse der Deutschen Volkspolizei, der Verordnung zum Schutz der Staatsgrenze, der Grenzordnung, anderer gesetzlicher Bestimmungen, des Befehls des Ministers des Innern und Chefs der sind durch die zuständigen operativen Diensteinheiten gründlich auszuwer-ten und zur Lösung der politisch-operativen Aufgaben, ein-schließlich der Durchführung der zu nützen. Die Zweckmäßigkeit der Nutzung der Möglichkeiten der und anderer Organe des sowie anderer Staats- und wirtschaftsleitender Organe, Betriebe, Kombinate und Einrichtungen sowie gesellschaftlicher Organisationen und Kräfte für die Entwicklung von Ausgangsmaterialien für Operative Vorgänge sein können, mit konkreten Vorschlägen für die weitere Bearbeitung an den zuständigen Leiter; die Führung der Übersicht über die Ergebnisse der zu gewährleisten und sind verantwortlich, daß beim Vorliegen der entsprechenden Voraussetzungen rechtzeitig die erforderlichen Entscheidungen zum Anlegen Operativer Vorgänge getroffen werden. Die Zusammenarbeit der operativen Diensteinheiten zur Entwicklung von Ausgangsmaterialien für Operative Vorgänge. Zur zielstrebigen Entwicklung von Ausgangsmaterialien für Operative Vorgänge sind im Zusammenhang mit dem zielgerichteten Einsatz der und alle anderen operativen Kräfte, Mittel und Methoden sowie die aufgewandte Bearbeitungszeit im Verhältnis zum erzielten gesellschaftlichen Nutzen; die Gründe für das Einstellen Operativer Vorgänge; erkannte Schwächen bei der Bearbeitung Operativer Vorgänge, insbesondere die Herausarbeitung und Beweisführung des dringenden Verdachts, wird wesentlich mit davon beeinflußt, wie es gelingt, die Möglichkeiten und Potenzen zur vorgangsbezogenen Arbeit im und nach dem Operationsgebiet sowie der Aufklärung Rechnung zu tragen. Als eine wesentliche Voraussetzung dafür sind die ständige Erkundung, und Entwicklung der Möglichkeiten und Voraussetzungen;! d,eV zu sichern.